Obama rejects being Clinton’s No. 2
“I don’t understand,” [Obama] said. “If I’m not ready, how is it that you think I should be such a great vice president?”
Yesterday I said, “If you’re not experienced enough to be Prez, you ain’t experienced enough to to be VP.”
See, the rational response to Hillary comes quite naturally. Even Spanky can do it.
-MC Spanky McGee
Sphere: Related Content
10 Mar 2008 MC Spanky McGee
I DON’T KNOW WHY HILARY WOULD WANT MUSLIM OBAMA FOR VICE PRESIDENT ANYWAY SHE IS ALOT SMARTER THAN HE IS AND ALSO SHE COULD THE COUNTRY WITHOUT HIS MUSLIM BELIEFS. PLUS I WOULDN’T VOTE FOR OBAMA IF U PAID ME BECAUSE I DON’T FOR A PRESIDENTIAL CANIDATE THAT LIKE TO COMMIT PLAGIARISM. ALSO LIKES TO DO BUSINESS WITH STEVE REVKO THAT IS BEING ENDITED FOR BEING A BAD POLITICIAN. NOT ONLY THAT BUT OBAMA FOLLOWS FARRAKHAN WHICH IS A MUSLIM LEADER.
Obama should pick Ron Paul as his running mate. Ron Paul has many Democratic values and would be good to help unify the country.
Obama is not ready to be presient, and I think that he could have been a little more gracious, consiering he preaches positives. He is not ready and if he is considered as a VP this would be to his benefit, he can learn, we the people don’t know where he has come from where he is going, and who he is. We don’t really know who he is. If Hillary had answered how Obama answered, she certainly would have gotten the guillitine! People that would think Obama has the experienced are the people that are dreaming and hoping that maybe he can make it! However just the thought that we have to think “Maybe” scares me. Obama is a cocky and pompus man and needs to come down to earth. Becasue there are 90% of the blacks voting for him is not because he has the experience.. Sorry if he was Colin Powel, maybe it would be people that knew better, but he is a little short to be compared to Colin Powell and I am a Democrat. I would have voted for Colin Powell in a min. Obama is not ready and he is letting all this go to his head! The man’s associations will tell you that there a a little less than desiarable. Karrahkan
who hates all jews and whites, Wrighte who is an intimate friend and mentor. William Ayers a radical Terrorist who bombed the Pentagon, so please we need to get to know who and what is Obama about, so don’t snub your note to VP, be gracious for as far as I am concern, you may have not voted for the war becasue it was against Radical Faciast Islamic, so would you have voted for the war if it was agianst China? or Greece, or Turkey? probably so..So if there is an idea that you may be offered the VP, you should be gracious and not be such a sore head..Don’t you realize Mr. Obama that people wonder about where you are coming from..We all really do not know. You have
given us nice words..But empty words!
Obama thinks he is too big for his bridges! His reaction to this was very ingenius! I wonder how Hillary would have reacted to this? and if she would have reacted like Obama did, the media would be all over her. Lets stop giving this empty Vessell a free Pass. Even SNL has made fun of the way the media has let Obama pass. The media has been giving Obama a Free Pass and its time to stop. The media never coverred Obama turning his back to the Black Caucus Convention. He was invited and yet never showed up. Sharpton sat there and stumbled and bumbled and then he resorted to say Hillary was there becasue she owed them..Rediculous!
The media has been cruel and unfair to Hillary, you have to admire her, because of her conviction, passion and perserverance. If the Media would have been fair she probably would be ahead..which brings me to pointing that Florida and Michigan was won by Hillary!!!!
The rules were that neither of the Candidate campaign in Florida or Michigan..The rule did not say you could not leave your name on the ballot.THE RULES WERE NOT TO CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA OR MICHIGA…Neither of the Candidates campaigned in Florida or Michigan.. Hillary won fair and square!!! and now look what is happening. Hillary and Obama\’s name was on the Florida Ballot and Hillary won fair and square. Obama took his name off Michigan, that was his choice!!! The rules did not requiere him to remove his name and he did ( This is called Inexperience) that was his choice !!! Now if it was Obama who won that would be it. They would be saying what I am saying here in Obama\’s behalf. This is unfair and I suggest all Hillary supporters to write, call, blogg and do what ever possible to bring this up.
The Obama suporters would be doing the same thing if this was the other way around. FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN SPOKE AND THEY SUPPORTED HILLARY AND IT IS TOTALLY UNFAIR TO SAY OTHERWISE!!! NOW THE REASON WHY WE HAVE TO BRING IN FLORIDA-FOR ALL OF YOU THAT WILL SCREEM \’UNFAIR\” IF FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN WAS NOT CONSIDERED WE WOULD NOT HAVE A CANDIDATE…THE RULES ARE AND LISTEN HERE; THE RULE IS THAT A NOMINATE HAS TO HAVE 12025 DELEGATES, IT DOES NOT SAY WHO HAS THE MOST, IT SAYS 12025. SO IF THE SUPER DELEGATES VOTE FOR HILLARY-PLEASE NO INTIMIDATION NO SCREEMING \’UNFAIR\” AND FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN DELEGATES SHOULD BE HILLARY AND SHE WOULD BE WINNING.
THIS IS TOTALLY UNFAIR!! AND THE OBAMA PEOPLE WILL BE INTIMIDATING, SO WELL AHVE TO BOW DOWN. WELL NO THIS IS NOT FAIR!!! HILLARY WON FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN FAIR AND SQUARE….
Hi,
I used to like Hillary Clinton but she is proving to be a horrendous candidate. She is divisive and polarizing and will unite the republican party against her and simultaneously she is tearing the democratic party in half.
Does anyone want to debate the Clinton legacy please remember Whitewater, Lewinsky, and a dozen other scandels that occurred during the Clinton years? The Clintons helped to bring about the end of the democratic majority in both houses of Congress.
I want a president who will unite the country and who will chart a new path to the future and not a bridge back to the past.
And those who want talk about experience: Abraham Lincoln (the president who freed the slaves and defeated the South) had as much experience as Obama. If experience is what you are voting for, some of the worst presidents in US history (ie. Grover Cleveland), had superior resumes when compared against Hillary Clinton.
Being president is not just about how much experience you have but the judgment that you can bring to the office. Abraham Lincoln had excellent judgment but little governmental or executive experience and he was a brilliant orator and he used that skill to keep the Nation united in its worst moment since the Revolutionary War.
If there is one person who find a commander in chief better than Abraham Lincoln please name that President given the challenges Lincoln faced.
I am not a democrat or republican but simply an American who loves his country and is sick of the Clinton and Bush Political wars.
Thanks,
PS. One more fact Lincoln is also from Illinois.
Re: David I’s post contains so many fallacies, I don’t even know where to begin. I allowed the comment just because it has so much crap in it.
1. Obama is muslim? False
2. Plagiarist? False.
3. “Follows” Farrakhan? Unsubstantiated/false.
Re: Vote4prosperity
MI and FL broke the party rules. Too bad. They’re cheaters–they tried to be unfair.
I’d say the same thing if those states went for Obama.
Re: David II. Rock on.
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep.
Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.
Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law.
Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.
Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.
The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.
In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.
Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!
Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?